Lately, we are being bombarded by owners against Facebook (the creation of Mark Zuckerberg), the usual warnings about privacy and fears public exposure, they say we have in the Social Networking world's most famous ...
Lately, we are being bombarded by Facebook cardholders (the creation of Mark Zuckerberg), the usual warnings about privacy and fears public exposure, we say the most famous Social Network the world, come back strongly, but still looking the other way with respect to other more serious than exposures to upload photos and comments to a window, as I said in ' too much information ... ', we face much more search engine in Internet browsers themselves or chatting with the aggravation that we are not as aware as we exhibit them.
recent months have added new stories to the paranoia about privacy, the famous Mendoza rata and exaggeration about the dangers of irresponsible use of Facebook, with the Social Network itself provides tools to attack this type of groups and request the blocking of the site or its members, I must admit that in my case, the news served to celebrate the initiative of the kids who organized such a move and I'm closer to wanting to hire that seeks to punish (perhaps motivated by having rata ever, in my time as a student). This massive rata joined other rateadas in Córdoba , Santa Fe and, finally, of La Plata incidents ended, with the violence, obviously, I disagree but I do not think should blame the Social Network for it.
After the news appeared on page '3 Romina reason to hate ' and I wondered how many fans have that page as to attract media attention (after leaving in the media reached 4965), journalists tore their clothes talking about unnecessary exposure, that had this girl, while exposed to a considerably larger audience by making notes on TV, interviews by the way, much more uncomfortable than a page that would have gone virtually unnoticed except for 20, 30 or 50 classmates class (assuming that everyone hated). Other news
with similar intentions were: 'Facebook could be a source of spread of computer viruses' , ' Facebook increases the divorce rate, according to a survey ', ' Labour issues on Facebook, a headache for companies' , 'Facebook change but not enough' , 'Facebook founder accused of using social network data to hack mails' , ' Beware of Facebook ', ' Is it too much to have 5001 Facebook friends? ' , 'Facebook has gone rogue, it's time for an open alternative' and believe me, just as apocalyptic muchísisisimas notes.
way of auction, the campaign came 'Facebook quit day' (day of abandonment of Facebook) which proposed massive cuts in Facebook for the last May 31 and resulted be an utter failure that day dropped out 27,000 of the 400 million users (I doubt it has generated any kind of stress to Zuckerberg.) This campaign was organized by a few users of the application but in view of the handle given the means to publish tutorials came to unsubscribe, it seems hard to believe that was organized by people and not a Corporation, Organization or a group of them. It proposed to replace Facebook and other composite applications (email, Twitter and Flickr ), created a group on Ning , go to a specialized network Akoha type or move to Orkut (Google's social network) and indicated that they felt excited about the project Diaspora, a proposal for open and distributed social network, similar to what I proposed in 'Google' you have in ' but pointing instead to end users of SME, as proposed in my note (I will present my views on the Diaspora Project in a forthcoming publication). Now, the Facebook privacy policy has improved according to the complaints of its users, who are interested to monitor and suggest changes or vote for other proposed changes can do so in the group ' Facebook site governance ' (government of the Facebook site) and receive relevant updates. Surely, it can improve the privacy policies of Facebook, you can distribute a lot more information and profit but the truth is, these improvements, they could apply to all other products of the Web and all Corporations profit through it and is not that so viciously attacked.
On the other hand, CNN, FOX News, BBC, El País, Clarín and La Nación are concerned about our privacy more than we do is highly suspect and, indeed, all of them still retain their accounts Facebook, it is clear that we to a Facebook campaign to discredit but what is due? Who would benefit by discrediting Facebook and how?
The Facebook phenomenon has several interesting corners, down here have not sat down to talk with either the CIA or the NSA (as have Microsoft and Google ) and that takes away control to the intelligence (and read power control), another key point is that Facebook refuses trading on the Stock Exchange , with consequent loss of power, in this case, for large corporations and financial groups (the owners of all want their share the new cake).
As media corporations, the big concern that arises from social networks can contradict them and take away credibility (as we say here, I spit roast) to agree that CNN, BBC and Fox News can invent any story that the rest of the media will deal with repeated without much research, here in Argentina was the first major conflict between the media and social networks when Diego famously said 'you have in the' media showed an outraged journalists grupete outburst by the technician while virtual communities, celebrating the occurrence of our God, if looking for the phrase appeared in endless lists of Twitter tweets, Facebook was going something similar with the positive comments about the phrase and jokes to the press and even created a page 'latenesadentro.com.ar' showing the video of the press conference.
If we look a bit of history from the unethical dealings of Google to enter China we have seen that the search engines was used to monitor the network and make invisible that which should not be seen and it seemed that the Internet search engine would be the same the means of the non-virtual, it seemed that, finally, would be able to control this bastion of anarchy called the Internet but the appearance Social Networking and Facebook's huge growth jeopardized the principle of control, to continue to grow could become an Internet itself, if you find it all in Facebook for what needs to rest and, in my humble opinion there is the big reason why everyone wants to get their hands on decision making of this new corporation.
Also, keep calm, Internet continually surprising and is quite likely that Facebook will eventually lose power, either because they put him achieve his claws polluting the usual suspects or the emergence of a new antichrist disguised nerd after all 5 years ago, who would imagine that Google could be overshadowed by a better idea ...
Author's Note: 'Sell a mailbox' is used to signal argentinismo grotesque or absurd lie, the phrase inspired by a scam that used to make compadritos Buenos Aires (political pointers early last century). The show off, was leaning on a mailbox, and were charged to foreigners and provincials to allow enter the letters in the public box, and thereafter, I commented on the desirability of owning a mailbox and a kind of toll charge to anyone to send a letter (at that time there was no mail mail and sent many letters), so, I ended up selling the box, literally. Obviously, whoever bought the mailbox noticed the scam when they try to charge tolls to anyone who knew the rules of the city and used to go home and ripped off with a black eye or a tooth loose.
On the other hand, CNN, FOX News, BBC, El País, Clarín and La Nación are concerned about our privacy more than we do is highly suspect and, indeed, all of them still retain their accounts Facebook, it is clear that we to a Facebook campaign to discredit but what is due? Who would benefit by discrediting Facebook and how? The Facebook phenomenon has several interesting corners, down here have not sat down to talk with either the CIA or the NSA (as have Microsoft and Google ) and that takes away control to the intelligence (and read power control), another key point is that Facebook refuses trading on the Stock Exchange , with consequent loss of power, in this case, for large corporations and financial groups (the owners of all want their share the new cake).
As media corporations, the big concern that arises from social networks can contradict them and take away credibility (as we say here, I spit roast) to agree that CNN, BBC and Fox News can invent any story that the rest of the media will deal with repeated without much research, here in Argentina was the first major conflict between the media and social networks when Diego famously said 'you have in the' media showed an outraged journalists grupete outburst by the technician while virtual communities, celebrating the occurrence of our God, if looking for the phrase appeared in endless lists of Twitter tweets, Facebook was going something similar with the positive comments about the phrase and jokes to the press and even created a page 'latenesadentro.com.ar' showing the video of the press conference.
If we look a bit of history from the unethical dealings of Google to enter China we have seen that the search engines was used to monitor the network and make invisible that which should not be seen and it seemed that the Internet search engine would be the same the means of the non-virtual, it seemed that, finally, would be able to control this bastion of anarchy called the Internet but the appearance Social Networking and Facebook's huge growth jeopardized the principle of control, to continue to grow could become an Internet itself, if you find it all in Facebook for what needs to rest and, in my humble opinion there is the big reason why everyone wants to get their hands on decision making of this new corporation.
Also, keep calm, Internet continually surprising and is quite likely that Facebook will eventually lose power, either because they put him achieve his claws polluting the usual suspects or the emergence of a new antichrist disguised nerd after all 5 years ago, who would imagine that Google could be overshadowed by a better idea ...
Author's Note: 'Sell a mailbox' is used to signal argentinismo grotesque or absurd lie, the phrase inspired by a scam that used to make compadritos Buenos Aires (political pointers early last century). The show off, was leaning on a mailbox, and were charged to foreigners and provincials to allow enter the letters in the public box, and thereafter, I commented on the desirability of owning a mailbox and a kind of toll charge to anyone to send a letter (at that time there was no mail mail and sent many letters), so, I ended up selling the box, literally. Obviously, whoever bought the mailbox noticed the scam when they try to charge tolls to anyone who knew the rules of the city and used to go home and ripped off with a black eye or a tooth loose.
0 comments:
Post a Comment